Tuesday, March 13, 2018

Using Life Insurance For Retirement Purposes

 David Kleinhandler Forbes Councils

When people hear the words “life insurance,” they immediately turn away from even discussing the matter. But what they may not understand is that it’s an asset — there to provide a stream of cash to help fund retirement tax-free and to pay for long-term care if you become ill.

The one fear we all have when getting close to retirement, even with all our planning, is whether we’ll have enough to last us through it. When doing your planning for retirement, you need to accept the reality that you could be retired for a long time and, if married, your savings may need to last for two lives — not just one.

Shutterstock

As you prepare for retirement, the money you are saving should be considered “safe money,” or funds you put away in secure conservative investments that will protect you from stock market volatility. What if you could invest and put the risk on the carrier and have downside protection? There are certain rules that will allow you to maximize the cash accumulation in your policy by following the 7702 guidelines, essentially funding to the maximum allowed under these guidelines. It’s basically creating a safe harbor without creating any penalties. Only an astute life insurance professional would know how to position these types of features correctly.

As you are contemplating retirement, it’s a common exercise to simplify your life by eliminating some of the things you no longer need. For example, you can eliminate monthly commuting costs and stop making contributions to the company 401(k) plan. If your kids are all grown and you’re on the verge of becoming an empty-nester, take a look at your home expenses and begin to think about a less expensive alternative. You may even consider canceling some or all of your life insurance policies. This is where you need to stop and realize exactly how the policies you currently own may have some value in your retirement.

As the nest begins to empty out, the need for life insurance begins to diminish. When you originally purchased your policy, you were probably looking at it as an income replacement tool to protect your family in case something happened to you and your income was lost. But, it is unrealistic to think that you may not still need that protection in retirement. Many retirees decide to re-enter the workforce for a variety of different reasons: to keep busy, for social interaction and to supplement their incomes. If that supplemental income is important to your retirement, your policy can continue to provide the same protection to your spouse during this period.

Your policy can also replace any income derived from your pension benefits, which may be either significantly reduced or eliminated entirely upon your death. The same holds true for social security benefits. When you pass away, your surviving spouse will only continue to receive the highest of the two benefits. The lower one will cease to exist.

In addition to income replacement, there are several other ways those policies you purchased can be beneficial to your retirement:

• Tax-Deferred Growth: If you purchased a permanent insurance product (whole life), then you’ve been building up cash for the entire time you’ve had it, and it has been growing on a tax-deferred basis. The dividends earned are considered a return of the premiums you’ve paid and are only taxable if the dividends exceed the premiums paid. You will not be required to pay any taxes until the policy is surrendered.

Read More: https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesfinancecouncil/2018/03/06/using-life-insurance-for-retirement-purposes/#7663861c57f0


from Best Insurance Quote https://www.bestinsurancequote.io/using-life-insurance-retirement-purposes/

Sunday, March 11, 2018

The life insurance retirees don’t need

When one is retired, cash flow matters. For many people, life insurance premiums can be a large budget item, and over a 25-year retirement, can be an enormous outlay. I work mainly for retirees and like to make sure these long-term trends are needed and working in their favor.

Life insurance is definitely needed during many different points in life. Planning for the possibility of a breadwinner’s death, replacing income, paying off the mortgage, setting up children’s college funds, and providing liquidity to pay estate taxes are all excellent reasons to have life insurance.

However, those needs come and go. The mortgage gets paid off. One spouse retires. Children are grown and educated. Or most recently, there may be a need to reduce your life insurance coverage, because the likelihood of paying estate tax has been significantly reduced by the new tax package.

Do you just cancel the life insurance when that happens? Not without careful consideration, but consideration there must be. Often people do keep coverage that is no longer insuring any risks or serving a clear purpose. The premiums get paid out of habit, momentum or who knows why. Should you keep paying the premiums? Maybe not.

Many life insurance policies were purchased for paying an estate tax that is often no longer needed. I remember from when I started as an advisor that the federal estate tax exemption was $1,200,000 for a couple, and it is now above $22 million. That means you generally need to have an estate of more than $22 million to owe federal estate tax, with some basic planning.

While the estate tax exemption could be reduced in the future, as it has bounced around a bit over the last 25 years, it seems politically probable to not have the estate tax affect middle America, even upper-middle America. So, you may not need that insurance coverage any longer and may still be paying for it.

It could be worse than that. The policy may have been purchased with a projected interest rate that is triple or quadruple the interest rate actually earned, and it will likely implode in the future – end up being canceled before you die. After paying all those premiums?! Yes, it could run out of cash value and be cancelled.

We are still in what has been at least a decade-long period of extremely low interest rates, and the cash values required to be in your policy to pay or subsidize your future premiums may not be quite the cash value the original agent was hoping. That means you should be paying attention to your cash value life insurance policies if you want them to continue. Internal annual insurance costs go up exponentially in your 60s and 70s.

What should I do? Canceling a poorly performing (declining value/imploding policy) or no-longer-needed life insurance policy can have a significant tax cost. There are options on handling the cash value without taxation, or it may be best just to take the cash value. Evaluate your policies and ask someone who is not selling you anything.

An insurance agent can make a substantial sale replacing your imploding policy with a new one, and admittedly that may be the right move. But first, you might talk directly to your insurance company and ask them if your policy might likely continue at current interest rates. Ask them how your policy is doing. “Is the policy going to give the results I want with reasonable assumptions?” is a fair question.

Consider whether you just want to keep the policy so your family receives the extra dollars at your death. Are the premiums affecting your lifestyle? Most importantly, do you really have a need for the insurance? Be sure to consider all options and obtain all relevant information before taking any actions that could potentially affect your retirement.

Read More: http://www.capegazette.com/article/life-insurance-retirees-don%E2%80%99t-need/151855


from Best Insurance Quote https://www.bestinsurancequote.io/life-insurance-retirees-dont-need/

Saturday, March 10, 2018

Simply Money: What kind of life insurance do you need?

Tyler from Oakley: My wife and I have a 6-month old daughter. What type of life insurance should we be getting?

Answer: Life insurance is there to protect your family financially in case you were to pass away; it does that by protecting your stream of income. When selecting the right life insurance policy for you and your family, there are a few things you want to consider.

You first want to determine how much your family would need annually to support their lifestyle. You also want to factor in any debts that will need to be paid off, such as the mortgage or education for your daughter. Once you’ve determined the correct amount, you have two general options: permanent life insurance and term life insurance.

Term life insurance is suitable for most families if there’s a need for protection. With term insurance, you select a certain period of time you would like to protect. The most common policies are for 10, 20, and 30 years. So, for instance, if you think your daughter will be out of house, her education will be paid for, and the mortgage will be paid off in 20 years, you might opt for a 20-year policy.

Permanent life insurance, also sometimes called ‘whole life,’ is more expensive and covers your entire lifespan. It can also be more complicated. This type of policy is most appropriate if you have a child with special needs, a large estate, or business needs.

As a word of caution: this type of life insurance is sometimes sold as an ‘investment.’ However, the extra premium you pay for permanent insurance should never be considered an investment. You’re essentially betting that you’ll die sooner than the insurance company actuaries think you will. They have carefully calculated the time value of your excess payments (net of their profit and commissions paid) and return that at death with a little interest added on.

There’s also an option called ‘self-insuring.’ As the name implies, this is when you have enough in savings to cover your family and their expenses, so no insurance policy is needed.

The Simply Money Point is that if you’re looking for a more affordable option, term life insurance may be the way to go. However, since everyone’s situation is different, Simply Money Advisors recommends working with a trusted financial planner (preferably a Certified Financial Planner™). A personalized financial plan can help determine the best type of insurance – and the amount – to meet your family’s needs.

Anthony and Becky from Western Hills: Should tax reform change how we think about saving for retirement?

Answer: As of right now, the Tax Cuts & Jobs Act doesn’t have too much of a direct impact on your retirement savings accounts. But there are a few considerations to keep in mind as you plan for retirement.

First, there’s a good chance your take-home pay is now a little higher since this new law lowers tax rates. Use this to your advantage and save that money. Even better, save the money in a Roth IRA if you’re eligible (or Roth 401(k)) – you pay taxes on the contributions now, but you’ll get tax-free growth. This essentially ‘locks in’ your tax rate at these lower tax rates.

Second, there’s been a big change to what’s called a Roth IRA ‘recharacterization.’ Under the new law, recharacterization will no longer be allowed. Here’s what that means: As explained above, with a Roth IRA, you contribute after-tax dollars, meaning when you take a distribution at age 59 ½, you don’t have to pay taxes on your earnings (assuming you’ve also held the account for at least five years).

In the past, some retirees would convert their traditional IRA assets (and its pre-tax money) into a Roth IRA account at the beginning of each year and pay the taxes on that conversion. However, if the market didn’t do well, or an increase in income bumped them into a higher tax bracket, they could decide to recharacterize that money – essentially, undo the conversion.

Now, if you do a Roth conversion, you must be 100% sure that’s the direction you would like to go and it makes sense for your financial goals and objectives. There are no longer any chances for do-overs.

The Simply Money Point is that no one fully knows the direction tax laws will take in years to come, so it’s important to save what you can now and take advantage of tax-favored accounts, such as a Roth IRA or Roth 401(k). Work with a trusted financial planner to strategically plan as much as possible.

Read More: https://www.cincinnati.com/story/money/2018/03/08/simply-money-what-kind-life-insurance-do-you-need/407712002/


from Best Insurance Quote https://www.bestinsurancequote.io/simply-money-kind-life-insurance-need/

Thursday, February 22, 2018

Will a DUI Affect Car Insurance in Wisconsin

For a car insurance quote: https://www.bestinsurancequote.io

 


from Best Insurance Quote https://www.bestinsurancequote.io/will-dui-affect-car-insurance-wisconsin/

Tuesday, February 20, 2018

Flooding not covered under your regular homeowners insurance

he combination of melting snow and heavy rainfall will bring Michigan’s already swollen river levels up — which means that flooding is possible. A flood watch is in effect for all of West Michigan through Wednesday.

To  be covered from flood damage, property owners must purchase a policy from the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Regular homeowners insurance won’t cut it.

“People may think they don’t need flood insurance, but considering that even just an inch of water can require a property owner to replace carpet, drywall, floor boards, moldings, doors and other belongings, it may be a coverage that they want to purchase from the federal government program,” said Lori Conarton, communications director for the Insurance Alliance of Michigan.

Flooding can occur in any season in Michigan, and NFIP estimates that 90-percent of all natural disasters involve flooding. Small amounts of water can cause tremendous damage.

Property owners should also be aware that coverage for water back up in basements — such as drain and sewer back up — is excluded from the flood insurance policy. That is optional coverage through most insurance companies. Coverage and limits vary by company, so check with your agent or company about specifics. Some insurers include full coverage for sump pump failure while others specify items that are covered.

Vehicles damaged in floods are covered by the comprehensive portion of your auto policy. Comprehensive coverage is optional in Michigan, so you should check with your insurance agent to make sure your covered.

Read More: http://www.wzzm13.com/news/local/michigan/flooding-not-covered-under-your-regular-homeowners-insurance/520592237


from Best Insurance Quote https://www.bestinsurancequote.io/flooding-not-covered-regular-homeowners-insurance/

Monday, February 19, 2018

In eastern Wisconsin, we’re using fewer health-care services and still paying more

People who get health insurance through their employer are going to doctors and hospitals less, but they and their employers still are spending more money on health care.

The reason: Prices keep going up.

From 2012 through 2016, health care spending for commercial insurance plans increased by an estimated 17.3% per person in eastern Wisconsin, compared with 15% nationally, according to an analysis of insurance claims by the Health Care Cost Institute.

The cost of living in the same four-year period increased by roughly 5%.

In short, health-care spending increased at roughly three times the inflation rate, even though people were using the same amount or fewer health care services.

“It’s becoming increasingly clear that our health-care spending problem is really a problem of prices,” said Hannah Neprash, a health economist and an assistant professor at the University of Minnesota.

That admittedly isn’t a surprise to anyone who has gotten a hospital bill.

But the analysis by the Health Care Cost Institute suggests that although health systems and physicians in eastern Wisconsin and nationally may be working to control costs and become more efficient, they also haven’t been reluctant to raise prices to maintain their profit margins.

From 2012 through 2016, prices in eastern Wisconsin increased by:

  • 22.85% for inpatient hospital services.
  • 16.76% for outpatient services
  • 16.71% for professional services, such as physician fees.
  • 30.3% for inpatient surgery.

None of this bodes well for controlling health-care costs — which account for a significant part of workers’ total compensation and take a chunk out of their take-home pay.

The increases also suggest that the ability to rein in health systems’ prices is limited.

The willingness of health system CEOs to raise prices while acknowledging that health-care spending is on an unsustainable trajectory may be a vestige of the days of cost-plus reimbursement.

“That mentality lives on — the mentality that we have a certain level of costs for providing the services we provide and we are entitled to be compensated for those costs,” said Chapin White, a senior policy researcher in health economics at the nonprofit think tank RAND Corp.

“It is consistent with the noble mission of serving your community.” White added. “But it also is defying basic economic reality.

“We need to be able to have some control over how much we spend on hospital care as a society, and employers who are providing health benefits should not be on the hook for financing hospitals at whatever level hospitals think is appropriate.”

That mindset may be seen in the increase in what commercial health plans spent on inpatient surgery.

The number of inpatient surgeries fell 12.59% from 2012 through 2016, while prices increased 30.03% in eastern Wisconsin, based on the Health Care Cost Institute’s data.

As a result, total spending on inpatient surgery increased 13.66% in the four-year period.

“Here is a place where the entire payer community should be focusing,” said Dave Osterndorf, a consultant and chief actuary at Health Exchange Resources in Glendale.

Prices for surgeries done at a hospital historically have been high — and yet health systems still raised prices, he said.

The same trend can be seen nationally: The number of inpatient surgeries decreased by 16.01%, but prices increased 29.96%.

The price increases suggest that hospitals raised prices to offset — or, in this case, more than offset — the drop in the number of patients.

The Health Care Cost Institute’s data also show that one of the characteristics of the market in eastern Wisconsin is that the prices of physician and other professional services are far above the national average — 58.7% higher.

“We have a lot of specialists in this marketplace,” Osterndorf said.

At the same time, the higher cost is partly offset by lower utilization of those services.

That could indicate the physicians do a better job in managing complex patients, Osterndorf said.

A 2014 study done by consulting firm Milliman for the Greater Milwaukee Business Foundation on Health also found that physician fees in southeastern Wisconsin were almost 50% higher on average than in other Midwest markets for commercial health plans.

Brian Potter, senior vice president of finance and chief operating officer of the Wisconsin Hospital Association, said the Health Care Cost Institute’s methodology is not transparent.

He also noted that the study conflicts with one done by Milliman that found payments to hospitals from commercial health plans in southeastern Wisconsin increased an estimated 8%, compared with 14.4% nationally, from 2012 through 2015.

Hospital care accounts for 30% to 35% of commercial health plans’ total costs.

Without question, health systems provide certain valuable services at a loss — a requirement to maintain their nonprofit tax status — and always have a long list of needed services that they would like to provide.

And some hospitals lose money. For example, Wheaton Franciscan-St. Joseph and Columbia St. Mary’s Hospital in Milwaukee, both part of Ascension, and Aurora Sinai Medical Center lost money in 2016, the most recent year that information is available from the Wisconsin Hospital Association.

Other hospitals, though, are quite profitable. Froedtert Hospital reported net income of $138.7 million and Aurora St. Luke’s Medical Center and Aurora St. Luke’s South Shore reported net income of $172.7 million in 2016.

Health systems also spend heavily on services to generate additional revenue and protect their market share, and those services often increase their costs.

Economists are increasingly focusing on the pricing power held by some health systems and other health-care providers, citing the effect that consolidation has had on prices.

In other sectors of economy, companies typically can’t simply raise prices. Whether the same constraints exist in health care is a question.

“They really don’t get rewarded for holding prices down,” Osterndorf said.

Few people pay attention to price once they reach the deductibles in their health plans. And most of the cost of health care for workers is hidden in the form of lower wages.

“That is a diffuse and invisible price tag,” White said.

Speaking last summer at the annual symposium held by the Center for Sustainable Health Spending, White cited a study in Indiana that found that the prices that private health insurance plans pay for outpatient services can be four times or more than what Medicare pays for the same services.

The Health Care Cost Institute’s national data are based on medical claims for 39 million people under the age of 65 who get health insurance through an employer.

The medical claims are from insurance companies including Aetna, Humana, Kaiser Permanente and UnitedHealthcare.

The data, which came only from eastern Wisconsin, contain medical claims for about 31% of the people who get health insurance through an employer in the state.

UnitedHealthcare has the largest market share by far in eastern Wisconsin, particularly in the southeastern part of the state, and is a reasonable benchmark for the prices that commercial health insurers pay for medical services.

The trends in eastern Wisconsin also are largely in line with other parts of the country.

“You can pick most states and see the same things,” said John Hargraves, a senior researcher at the Health Care Cost Institute.

Price increases apply only to commercial health plans because Medicare and Medicaid both dictate the prices they will pay. And the Health Care Cost Institute is permitted to use the claims data but cannot disclose any specific prices negotiated between commercial health insurers and health systems.

“It’s hard to get your hands on useful price data for private health plans,” White said. “There’s just a lot of mystery in prices and price trends.”

The Health Care Cost Institute’s data, while not definitive, has become one of the best sources for trends in health care spending for employers and employees.

Neprash, the health economist at the University of Minnesota, described the Health Care Cost Institute as a “uniquely detailed source of data.”

Several states — including Minnesota, Massachusetts, Colorado, Oregon and Maryland — have claims databases that are tracking and reporting costs and prices. Maryland, for example, has a new website that discloses prices for specific services at specific hospitals.

Wisconsin also has a claims database but for now is tracking only the utilization of services.

Other studies also have pointed to higher prices as the reason the United States spends 50% more than any other developed country on health care.

The studies — including a 2004 paper titled “It’s the Prices, Stupid” — counter the widely held belief that the U.S. spends more on health care because people use more health care.

Americans overall use fewer services than people in other developed countries.

“It’s a story about prices,” Neprash said. “It’s not about how much health care we use.”

Read More: https://www.jsonline.com/story/money/business/health-care/2018/02/19/eastern-wisconsin-using-fewer-health-care-services-and-still-paying-more/339497002/


from Best Insurance Quote https://www.bestinsurancequote.io/eastern-wisconsin-using-fewer-health-care-services-still-paying/